Moore Fallout

Michael Moore’s movie “Fahrenheit 911” has fallen off the radar. It didn’t help elect John Kerry, and even many liberals are put off by the guy’s self-righteousness. (I’m not among them.)

But George Mason University is paying a price for Moore’s fame. Last year, GMU rescinded an invitation to Moore to speak on the campus after his $35,000 fee was revealed and criticized by Del. Dick Black (R- Sterling) [Disclosure]. Black wasn’t objecting to the fee as much as the fact that Moore was going to speak on the campus. The fee was just a convenient excuse, in my opinion. GMU immediately announced http://commonwealthcommonsense.typepad.com/commonwealthcommonsense/2004/10/moore_censored_.html that Moore was uninvited. There was talk that Moore might come anyway or that another group would pay his bill, but none did and he didn’t come. GMU said it was about money, not censorship.

But the national honor society Phi Beta Kappa isn’t buying that. Today, it was revealed that the national honor society rejected GMU’s application for a campus chapter. Little was reported about the aftermath of GMU’s decision, although we now learn reporters missed the furor, or decided against reporting it

In the weeks after the cancellation, the American Association of University Professors sent George Mason a sharply worded letter that accused administrators of canceling the speech to "placate members of the state legislature." Faculty members questioned [GMU President Alan] Merten about the incident during a faculty senate meeting.

Several professors, including James T. Bennett, faculty senate chairman and economics professor, said they are disheartened that one result of the controversy is that the university will go at least another three years without a Phi Beta Kappa chapter.

Bennett said most of his colleagues felt "very strongly" that $35,000, to be paid by the state, was too much to pay for a speaker and that Moore should not have been invited to speak on the state school's dime. Still, he said, he and many other professors felt that once the invitation had been extended, the university should have stuck by it.

"We really don't look good in the academic community," Bennett said. "This gives the appearance of some outside meddling in the university."

Provost Peter Stearns acknowledged that the university "fumbled a bit" by offering and then rescinding an invitation but said Moore would have been welcome if he had appeared for a small stipend or if the event had been funded with private money. He said he thinks Phi Beta Kappa rushed to an unfair judgment in a misguided effort to defend academic freedom.

"I thought this was seizing on a complex single event as a comment on faculty governance and commitment to freedom of speech, and I was disappointed," Stearns said.

[The GMU professor who led the application process Marion] Deshmukh declined to provide copies of letters sent to the university from Phi Beta Kappa, but she read some portions to a reporter. One letter from the organization asked about media reports that a Virginia legislator had "influenced your president" to cancel a speaking event. Phi Beta Kappa officials also wrote that the incident "renewed concerns about governance problems" at the university.

Ultimately, Phi Beta Kappa decided not to visit the university and rejected a request by about 40 Phi Beta Kappa faculty members to reconsider, Deshmukh said. She said she was frustrated that society officials did not come to campus to question students and professors about the incident.

"We vehemently denied that academic freedom was impinged. The fee was the issue," Deshmukh said. "If they had come and talked to us and walked around campus and not just closed the debate . . . I think they would have found mostly the reaction was this guy is charging a lot of money that would be better spent elsewhere."

But what we still, six months later, do not know is what fees GMU has paid to other speakers. Are there conservative speakers who’ve been paid to speak? And how much?

I’ve sent an email to GMU President Alan Merten asking that GMU reveal fees paid to all speakers over the past 10 years. If anyone else cares to, his email address is [email protected] [Editor's Note: The preceding sentence was edited for clarity and format.]

Comments

[Eileen]

Angered by a scheduled appearance by film-maker Michael Moore at George Mason University, Dick Black led fellow conservatives in a letter writing campaign to GMU President Alan Merton; the university backed down and cancelled the evening, for which the non-university public would have been charged admission to offset the fee they planned to give Moore. Black claimed in his open letter that the event amounted to "a get-out-the-vote effort for the Democratic Party."

A GMU spokesman explained that the school often hosts "provocative" speakers because of the university's mission to help students develop critical, analytical, and imaginative thinking. Other speakers have included controversial scholar Cornell West, conservative U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, and Margaret Thatcher.

Yet Black was silent in 2003 when state university William & Mary invited Newt Gingrich, former Speaker of the House, to speak at a free public event. The event was cancelled due to weather. Based on Gingrich's payment to speak at a 2003 local Republican committee fundraiser, his fee for this event would have been at least $12,000.

Sources: Washington Times, Sept. 30, 2004, FreeRepublic.com, Washington Post, Oct. 1, 2004, William & Mary News